Sirin Software vs Integra Sources: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Integra Sources (4.2/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. Integra Sources is the stronger option for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Integra Sources: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| HQ | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) | Astana, Kazakhstan |
| Team size | 50–200 | 30–60 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home |
Sirin Software vs Integra Sources: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Capability | Sirin Software | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Sirin Software vs Integra Sources: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs Integra Sources (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Integra Sources fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Integra Sources
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team.
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. If your situation matches that, Integra Sources is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Integra Sources FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Integra Sources?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware.
How do Sirin Software and Integra Sources differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Integra Sources?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Integra Sources?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 30–60), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Healthcare vs Consumer electronics, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.