Promwad vs Integra Sources: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Promwad (4.5/5) edges ahead of Integra Sources (4.2/5) overall. Promwad is the better choice for mass-produced electronics, Linux and FPGA designs. Integra Sources is the stronger option for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Promwad vs Integra Sources: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Promwad | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2014 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania and Essen, Germany | Astana, Kazakhstan |
| Team size | 100–150 | 30–60 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded Linux, Yocto, FPGA | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 |
| Industries served | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home |
Promwad vs Integra Sources: overview
Promwad
Roman Pakholkov started Promwad in Minsk in 2004 to design mass-produced electronics on systems-on-chip and Linux, and the company later moved its business into the EU. Its Vilnius office, opened in 2016, became a headquarters, and a German entity in Essen now serves the DACH region. Promwad reports 100+ engineers, 500+ projects, and more than 3 million devices produced by its clients. Telecoms, automotive and FPGA work are its strongest areas.
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Services and capabilities: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Capability | Promwad | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Framework / platform | Promwad | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Criterion | Promwad | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Dimension | Promwad | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production., An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Promwad vs Integra Sources: pros and cons
| Promwad | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support |
| + | Strong embedded Linux and FPGA skills for complex devices |
| + | EU entities in Lithuania and Germany simplify contracting for European buyers |
| - | Belarusian origins may need explaining to some procurement teams, though operations have moved to the EU |
| - | Cloud and app development are thinner than its hardware and firmware work |
| - | Small team limits parallel projects |
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
Who should choose Promwad?
A typical fit: a telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production.
Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy.
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Promwad |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Promwad (Not published) vs Integra Sources (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Promwad |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Promwad |
Use case fit: Promwad vs Integra Sources
| Use case | Promwad fit | Integra Sources fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production. | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
| An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. | Strong | Limited | Promwad |
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Promwad vs Integra Sources
Promwad (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries.
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. If your situation matches that, Integra Sources is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Promwad vs Integra Sources FAQ
Is Promwad better than Integra Sources?
Promwad (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Promwad's strongest advantage: designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware.
How do Promwad and Integra Sources differ in pricing?
Promwad uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Promwad or Integra Sources?
Promwad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Promwad and Integra Sources?
Promwad's primary differentiator is: two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. They also differ in team size (100–150 vs 30–60), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Telecoms, Automotive vs Consumer electronics, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.