Capgemini Engineering
Capgemini's engineering and R&D arm, built on the 2020 Altran acquisition, with roughly 65,000 people
What is Capgemini Engineering?
Capgemini Engineering is the result of Capgemini's purchase of Altran, which closed in April 2020. Revelio Labs estimated around 64,700 employees in September 2025, down about 5% on the year. It combines Altran's engineering and R&D services with Capgemini's digital manufacturing work, and analysts pointed to Altran's operational technology skills as the reason for the deal. It is the strongest option here for large, compliance-heavy programmes.
Capgemini Engineering works primarily with clients in Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare sectors. What sets it apart: The largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise.
Capgemini Engineering tech stack and services
| Service area |
|---|
| Electronics & PCB |
| Firmware |
| Wireless Connectivity |
| IoT Cloud |
| Edge AI & Data |
| Dedicated Teams |
Capgemini Engineering pricing
Short answer: Capgemini Engineering uses a time and materials, managed service, outcome-based pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Managed service | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Time and materials | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
Capgemini Engineering pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Can run very large global engineering programmes | -Headcount fell about 5% in 2025 |
| +Factory and operational technology expertise from Altran | -Slow and costly for small product teams |
| +Mature compliance and quality systems |
Capgemini Engineering vs alternatives
How Capgemini Engineering compares to the other top IoT Development companies.
| Company | Best for | Main difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemberg Solutions | Connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Softeq | US companies wanting a domestic full-stack IoT partner. | Nearly three decades of US-led engineering, with custom hardware and firmware under the same roof as cloud and apps | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Promwad | Mass-produced electronics, Linux and FPGA designs. | Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| Witekio | Embedded Linux, board support and device updates. | Embedded software specialist backed by Avnet's component supply chain | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| ByteSnap Design | UK hardware projects, ATEX and EV charging. | UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Cambridge Consultants | Novel sensing and wireless, first-of-a-kind devices. | Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| Zühlke | Regulated connected devices, medtech. | Swiss quality processes applied to connected medical and industrial products | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Etteplan | Industrial machinery makers, Nordic buyers. | Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Bluefruit Software | Embedded software for medical and scientific devices. | Employee-owned embedded software team with a strong testing culture | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Sirin Software | Firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Indeema Software | IoT-focused boutique, firmware plus cloud. | A company built around IoT from day one, with its own R&D hub | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Integra Sources | Budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Very | Funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| Jaycon | Design plus manufacturing from one vendor. | Takes a device from industrial design to production runs, including enclosures | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Embitel Technologies | Automotive and connected-vehicle IoT. | Automotive embedded engineering backed by Volkswagen Group ownership | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Spyrosoft | Embedded and automotive teams at Polish rates. | Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | IoT platforms needing large data and cloud teams. | Big cloud and data bench to put behind a device programme | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Intellias | Connected vehicles, navigation and infotainment. | Automotive connectivity work recognised by Frost & Sullivan and BlackBerry | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftServe | Cloud IoT platforms and digital twins. | Cloud partner depth and large teams for IoT data platforms | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software | Embedded and cloud teams under Swedish ownership. | Scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Cogniteq | IoT MVPs with an EU-based vendor. | Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| MobiDev | IoT apps with AI or AR features. | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| ScienceSoft | IoT dashboards and business-system integration. | Long software consulting history applied to IoT monitoring platforms | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| GlobalLogic | Large industrial IoT programmes, Hitachi ecosystem. | Chip-to-cloud engineering backed by Hitachi's industrial portfolio | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Tata Elxsi | Software-defined vehicles, set-top boxes, large teams. | Design and embedded engineering at Indian rates with Tata Group backing | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| L&T Technology Services | Engineering capacity for industrial and medtech OEMs. | Large engineering R&D capacity with industrial group backing | 3.8 | Full comparison |
| Cyient | Engineering outsourcing for aerospace and rail OEMs. | Broad engineering services with embedded work for heavy-industry clients | 3.8 | Full comparison |
Capgemini Engineering FAQ
What is Capgemini Engineering?
Capgemini's engineering and R&D arm, built on the 2020 Altran acquisition, with roughly 65,000 people
How much does Capgemini Engineering charge?
Capgemini Engineering uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does Capgemini Engineering use?
Capgemini Engineering works with Embedded C/C++, AUTOSAR, Industrial protocols, Azure IoT, AWS IoT, Digital twins. Primary industries served include Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare.
Is Capgemini Engineering right for enterprise?
Global manufacturers, compliance-heavy programmes. 50,000+ team size. Main consideration: Headcount fell about 5% in 2025.
What are the best Capgemini Engineering alternatives?
The best alternatives to Capgemini Engineering depend on your use case. Top options are:
- Lemberg Solutions: electrical engineering, fpga, rtos and embedded linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company
- Softeq: nearly three decades of us-led engineering, with custom hardware and firmware under the same roof as cloud and apps
- Promwad: two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five eu countries
Compare Capgemini Engineering with other IoT Development companies
Verify all details directly with Capgemini Engineering before making a decision.