Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Promwad (4.5/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Promwad is the stronger option for mass-produced electronics, Linux and FPGA designs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2004 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Vilnius, Lithuania and Essen, Germany |
| Team size | 200+ | 100–150 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | Embedded Linux, Yocto, FPGA |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Promwad
Roman Pakholkov started Promwad in Minsk in 2004 to design mass-produced electronics on systems-on-chip and Linux, and the company later moved its business into the EU. Its Vilnius office, opened in 2016, became a headquarters, and a German entity in Essen now serves the DACH region. Promwad reports 100+ engineers, 500+ projects, and more than 3 million devices produced by its clients. Telecoms, automotive and FPGA work are its strongest areas.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Promwad |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production., An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Promwad | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support |
| + | Strong embedded Linux and FPGA skills for complex devices |
| + | EU entities in Lithuania and Germany simplify contracting for European buyers |
| - | Belarusian origins may need explaining to some procurement teams, though operations have moved to the EU |
| - | Cloud and app development are thinner than its hardware and firmware work |
| - | Small team limits parallel projects |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Promwad?
A typical fit: a telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production.
Two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Telecoms, Automotive, Industrial equipment, Consumer electronics, Energy.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Promwad (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Promwad fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A telecoms equipment maker needs a Linux-based gateway designed for volume production. | Limited | Strong | Promwad |
| An automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. | Limited | Strong | Promwad |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Promwad (4.5/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an automotive supplier needs FPGA and camera-processing work. If your situation matches that, Promwad is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Promwad FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Promwad's strongest advantage: designs with mass production in mind, including manufacturing support.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Promwad differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Promwad uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Promwad?
Promwad is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Promwad?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Promwad's primary differentiator is: two decades designing devices for volume production, with offices across five EU countries. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 100–150), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Telecoms, Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.