Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. ByteSnap Design is the stronger option for UK hardware projects, ATEX and EV charging. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2008 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Birmingham, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 200+ | Under 50 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | PCB design, Embedded Linux, FPGA |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
ByteSnap Design
ByteSnap Design was set up in Birmingham in 2008 and works from Park Point in Longbridge. It designs printed circuit boards, embedded Linux and firmware, FPGA logic and low-power wireless products, including ATEX-rated designs for hazardous areas and EV charging controller boards. The team is under 50 people. In December 2025 it reported 13% turnover growth and launched an automated board-test service and an obsolescence management service.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | ByteSnap Design |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed., An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| ByteSnap Design | |
|---|---|
| + | UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware |
| + | ATEX experience is rare and useful for oil, gas and chemical sites |
| + | Obsolescence management helps keep long-life products buildable |
| - | Small team, so large programmes will stretch it |
| - | Limited cloud and app development compared with full-stack vendors |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose ByteSnap Design?
A typical fit: a UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed.
UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Automotive, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs ByteSnap Design (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | ByteSnap Design fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A UK manufacturer needs an ATEX-certified sensor designed. | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| An EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. | Limited | Strong | ByteSnap Design |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
ByteSnap Design (4.4/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an EV charging company wants a controller board and firmware. If your situation matches that, ByteSnap Design is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs ByteSnap Design FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. ByteSnap Design's strongest advantage: UK engineers handle both the board and the firmware.
How do Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. ByteSnap Design uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and ByteSnap Design?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. ByteSnap Design's primary differentiator is: UK-based board and firmware design with services that continue after the product ships. They also differ in team size (200+ vs Under 50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Industrial equipment, Automotive).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.