Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) edges ahead of Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) overall. Lemberg Solutions is the better choice for connected products needing hardware, firmware and cloud. Cambridge Consultants is the stronger option for novel sensing and wireless, first-of-a-kind devices. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 1960 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine (offices in London, Hamburg, Kraków) | Cambridge, United Kingdom (part of Capgemini) |
| Team size | 200+ | 800–900 |
| Rating | 4.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company | Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team | Time and materials, fixed price for defined phases |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, RTOS, Embedded Linux | RF design, Embedded C/C++, DSP |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment | Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics, Industrial equipment, Agriculture |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: overview
Lemberg Solutions
Few IoT vendors can design the circuit board, write the RTOS firmware, program an FPGA and build the cloud back end without subcontracting part of it. Lemberg Solutions does all of that with 200+ engineers, working since 2007 from Lviv and Kraków with client-facing offices in London and Hamburg. Its connectivity and edge AI work is backed by partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics, plus an in-house lab for prototyping and testing. Clients include Bosch Rexroth, Astronics, Caltech, Cellink, Ferno and Speede.
Cambridge Consultants
Cambridge Consultants has been developing products for clients since 1960 and employs more than 800 engineers, scientists and designers in Cambridge, Boston, Tokyo and Singapore. It came into Capgemini when Capgemini bought its parent Altran in 2020, and joined Capgemini Invent in 2021. Work spans medical devices, wireless systems, sensing and other early-stage technology. It also licenses intellectual property it creates.
Services and capabilities: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Capability | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Framework / platform | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Criterion | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Team extension, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Dimension | Lemberg Solutions | Cambridge Consultants |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy | Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard., An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | A medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device., A telecoms company wants a custom radio designed. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants: pros and cons
| Lemberg Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team |
| + | Partnerships with NXP, Microchip and STMicroelectronics help with early silicon access and vendor support |
| + | In-house lab shortens the loop between a prototype failing a test and a fix being tried |
| + | Builds products to the relevant industry standards and protocols, with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification behind its security and quality processes |
| + | Edge AI and computer vision experience for devices that need to decide locally instead of sending everything to the cloud |
| + | Client owns all intellectual property, including hardware designs |
| - | No in-house mass production; finished devices need a separate contract manufacturer |
| - | Regulatory approvals such as CE, FCC or medical clearances stay the client's job, though Lemberg prepares the technical files |
| - | A 200-person company can run several product teams in parallel but not a 100-engineer programme |
| Cambridge Consultants | |
|---|---|
| + | Can solve physics and RF problems that most IoT vendors would avoid |
| + | Long medical device record with quality systems to match |
| + | Capgemini's global network for scale-up after development |
| - | Owned by Capgemini since 2020 through the Altran deal |
| - | Premium pricing that rarely suits ordinary connected products |
| - | Less focus on long-term cloud operations |
Who should choose Lemberg Solutions?
A typical fit: a medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard.
Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive, Energy, Transportation and logistics, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Cambridge Consultants?
A typical fit: a medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device.
Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics, Industrial equipment, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Lemberg Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lemberg Solutions (Not published) vs Cambridge Consultants (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lemberg Solutions |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Lemberg Solutions |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Lemberg Solutions |
Use case fit: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
| Use case | Lemberg Solutions fit | Cambridge Consultants fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medical device maker needs a wearable designed, from sensor board and BLE firmware to the clinician dashboard. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| An industrial firm wants retrofit sensors and a remote monitoring platform for equipment already in the field. | Strong | Limited | Lemberg Solutions |
| A medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device. | Limited | Strong | Cambridge Consultants |
| A telecoms company wants a custom radio designed. | Limited | Strong | Cambridge Consultants |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company.
Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a telecoms company wants a custom radio designed. If your situation matches that, Cambridge Consultants is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lemberg Solutions vs Cambridge Consultants FAQ
Is Lemberg Solutions better than Cambridge Consultants?
Lemberg Solutions (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lemberg Solutions's strongest advantage: designs the electronics as well as the software, so firmware problems caused by a board revision get fixed by the same team. Cambridge Consultants's strongest advantage: can solve physics and RF problems that most IoT vendors would avoid.
How do Lemberg Solutions and Cambridge Consultants differ in pricing?
Lemberg Solutions uses time and materials, fixed price, dedicated team pricing. Cambridge Consultants uses time and materials, fixed price for defined phases pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lemberg Solutions or Cambridge Consultants?
Cambridge Consultants is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lemberg Solutions and Cambridge Consultants?
Lemberg Solutions's primary differentiator is: electrical engineering, FPGA, RTOS and embedded Linux work alongside cloud, data and app teams in one company. Cambridge Consultants's primary differentiator is: scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules. They also differ in team size (200+ vs 800–900), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Automotive vs Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.