MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
MobiDev (3.9/5) edges ahead of Capgemini Engineering (3.9/5) overall. MobiDev is the better choice for IoT apps with AI or AR features. Capgemini Engineering is the stronger option for global manufacturers, compliance-heavy programmes. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | MobiDev | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2009 | 1982 |
| HQ | Norcross, Georgia, United States | Paris, France |
| Team size | 250–450 | 50,000+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills | The largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, managed service, outcome-based |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT | Embedded C/C++, AUTOSAR, Industrial protocols |
| Industries served | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics | Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare |
MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering: overview
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Capgemini Engineering
Capgemini Engineering is the result of Capgemini's purchase of Altran, which closed in April 2020. Revelio Labs estimated around 64,700 employees in September 2025, down about 5% on the year. It combines Altran's engineering and R&D services with Capgemini's digital manufacturing work, and analysts pointed to Altran's operational technology skills as the reason for the deal. It is the strongest option here for large, compliance-heavy programmes.
Services and capabilities: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Capability | MobiDev | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✗ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Framework / platform | MobiDev | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | N/A | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Criterion | MobiDev | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Managed service, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Dimension | MobiDev | Capgemini Engineering |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment | Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | An aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering., A manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering: pros and cons
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
| Capgemini Engineering | |
|---|---|
| + | Can run very large global engineering programmes |
| + | Factory and operational technology expertise from Altran |
| + | Mature compliance and quality systems |
| - | Headcount fell about 5% in 2025 |
| - | Slow and costly for small product teams |
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Who should choose Capgemini Engineering?
A typical fit: an aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering.
The largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Aerospace, Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: MobiDev (Not published) vs Capgemini Engineering (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Capgemini Engineering |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Capgemini Engineering |
Use case fit: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
| Use case | MobiDev fit | Capgemini Engineering fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Strong | Limited | MobiDev |
| An aerospace firm needs certified embedded engineering. | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| A manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Strong | Capgemini Engineering |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering
MobiDev (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills.
Capgemini Engineering (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a manufacturer wants a smart factory rolled out across sites. If your situation matches that, Capgemini Engineering is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
MobiDev vs Capgemini Engineering FAQ
Is MobiDev better than Capgemini Engineering?
MobiDev (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT. Capgemini Engineering's strongest advantage: can run very large global engineering programmes.
How do MobiDev and Capgemini Engineering differ in pricing?
MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Capgemini Engineering uses time and materials, managed service, outcome-based pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: MobiDev or Capgemini Engineering?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between MobiDev and Capgemini Engineering?
MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Capgemini Engineering's primary differentiator is: the largest engineering bench on this list, with factory and operational technology expertise. They also differ in team size (250–450 vs 50,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Retail, Healthcare vs Automotive, Aerospace).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.