Integra Sources vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Integra Sources (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Integra Sources is the better choice for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integra Sources vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Astana, Kazakhstan | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | 30–60 | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
Integra Sources vs Very: overview
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: Integra Sources vs Very
| Capability | Integra Sources | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Integra Sources vs Very
| Framework / platform | Integra Sources | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integra Sources vs Very
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integra Sources vs Very
| Dimension | Integra Sources | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Time and materials |
Integra Sources vs Very: pros and cons
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Integra Sources vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integra Sources (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Integra Sources |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Integra Sources vs Very
| Use case | Integra Sources fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
Verdict: Integra Sources vs Very
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integra Sources vs Very FAQ
Is Integra Sources better than Very?
Integra Sources (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do Integra Sources and Very differ in pricing?
Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integra Sources or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integra Sources and Very?
Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (30–60 vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Logistics vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.