Integra Sources vs Cogniteq: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Integra Sources (4.2/5) edges ahead of Cogniteq (4.0/5) overall. Integra Sources is the better choice for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. Cogniteq is the stronger option for IoT MVPs with an EU-based vendor. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Integra Sources vs Cogniteq: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Cogniteq |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| HQ | Astana, Kazakhstan | Vilnius, Lithuania (offices in Poland) |
| Team size | 30–60 | 50–250 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list | Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering |
| Pricing model | Fixed price, time and materials | Time and materials, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 | Embedded C, BLE, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home | Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home, Retail |
Integra Sources vs Cogniteq: overview
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Cogniteq
Cogniteq was founded in 2005 and lists its locations as Lithuania and Poland, with a head office in Vilnius. It has 50 to 250 people, depending on the directory, and reports more than 300 launched projects. Its IoT services include consulting, application development, MVPs and hardware engineering, next to web, mobile and enterprise work. Its Clutch profile shows a 4.9 rating from 44 reviews.
Services and capabilities: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Capability | Integra Sources | Cogniteq |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Framework / platform | Integra Sources | Cogniteq |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Criterion | Integra Sources | Cogniteq |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Dimension | Integra Sources | Cogniteq |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment | Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home |
| Best use cases | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | A start-up needs a connected health MVP., A logistics firm wants a BLE tracking app. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Integra Sources vs Cogniteq: pros and cons
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
| Cogniteq | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong client reviews |
| + | EU locations for contracting |
| + | Handles MVPs well |
| - | Hardware engineering is less established than its software work |
| - | Office details differ between sources |
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Who should choose Cogniteq?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a connected health MVP.
Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home, Retail.
Decision matrix: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Integra Sources |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Integra Sources (Not published) vs Cogniteq (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Integra Sources |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Integra Sources |
Use case fit: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
| Use case | Integra Sources fit | Cogniteq fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Strong | Limited | Integra Sources |
| A start-up needs a connected health MVP. | Limited | Strong | Cogniteq |
| A logistics firm wants a BLE tracking app. | Limited | Strong | Cogniteq |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Integra Sources vs Cogniteq
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list.
Cogniteq (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a logistics firm wants a BLE tracking app. If your situation matches that, Cogniteq is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Integra Sources vs Cogniteq FAQ
Is Integra Sources better than Cogniteq?
Integra Sources (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware. Cogniteq's strongest advantage: strong client reviews.
How do Integra Sources and Cogniteq differ in pricing?
Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Cogniteq uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Integra Sources or Cogniteq?
Cogniteq is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Integra Sources and Cogniteq?
Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Cogniteq's primary differentiator is: mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering. They also differ in team size (30–60 vs 50–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Logistics vs Healthcare, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.