Etteplan vs Integra Sources: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Etteplan (4.3/5) edges ahead of Integra Sources (4.2/5) overall. Etteplan is the better choice for industrial machinery makers, Nordic buyers. Integra Sources is the stronger option for budget hardware and firmware for start-ups. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Etteplan vs Integra Sources: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Etteplan | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2014 |
| HQ | Espoo, Finland | Astana, Kazakhstan |
| Team size | 3,500–4,000 | 30–60 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company | Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, managed service | Fixed price, time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, PCB design | PCB design, Embedded C, STM32 |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home |
Etteplan vs Integra Sources: overview
Etteplan
Etteplan is a Finnish engineering services company with around 3,800 to 4,000 staff in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Denmark and China. Its Software and Embedded Solutions unit develops embedded software, electronics and IoT systems for industrial manufacturers. In March 2026 the company finished change negotiations in that unit covering 336 people in Finland and cut up to 28 jobs. It also does mechanical engineering and technical documentation, which is useful when a product needs more than electronics.
Integra Sources
Two hardware and software engineers founded Integra Sources in 2014, and it is based in Astana, Kazakhstan. The team is small, cited at 30 to 50+ people, and it designs electronics, writes firmware and builds IoT and embedded systems. Portfolio projects include an asset tracker, a robotic lawnmower and a pet camera. It reports more than 250 completed projects.
Services and capabilities: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Capability | Etteplan | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Framework / platform | Etteplan | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | N/A |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Criterion | Etteplan | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Managed service, Time and materials | Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Dimension | Etteplan | Integra Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare | Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line., An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype., A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Etteplan vs Integra Sources: pros and cons
| Etteplan | |
|---|---|
| + | Can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics |
| + | Public listing gives transparency on finances |
| + | Large Nordic industrial client base |
| - | Cut up to 28 jobs in its embedded unit in Finland in March 2026 |
| - | Heavier process and overhead than boutique IoT firms |
| Integra Sources | |
|---|---|
| + | Low rates for both hardware and firmware |
| + | Hands-on prototype experience across many consumer devices |
| + | Accepts small fixed-price projects |
| - | Very small team |
| - | Kazakhstan location is unfamiliar to many procurement teams |
| - | Thin cloud platform capability |
Who should choose Etteplan?
A typical fit: a machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line.
Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive.
Who should choose Integra Sources?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype.
Electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Logistics, Industrial equipment, Smart home.
Decision matrix: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Etteplan |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Etteplan (Not published) vs Integra Sources (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Etteplan |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Etteplan |
Use case fit: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
| Use case | Etteplan fit | Integra Sources fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| A start-up needs a GPS asset tracker prototype. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| A consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. | Limited | Strong | Integra Sources |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
Verdict: Etteplan vs Integra Sources
Etteplan (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company.
Integra Sources (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a consumer brand wants a low-cost BLE device designed. If your situation matches that, Integra Sources is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Etteplan vs Integra Sources FAQ
Is Etteplan better than Integra Sources?
Etteplan (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Etteplan's strongest advantage: can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics. Integra Sources's strongest advantage: low rates for both hardware and firmware.
How do Etteplan and Integra Sources differ in pricing?
Etteplan uses time and materials, fixed price, managed service pricing. Integra Sources uses fixed price, time and materials pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Etteplan or Integra Sources?
Etteplan is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Etteplan and Integra Sources?
Etteplan's primary differentiator is: Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Integra Sources's primary differentiator is: electronics design and firmware at some of the lowest rates on this list. They also differ in team size (3,500–4,000 vs 30–60), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Consumer electronics, Logistics).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.