Spyrosoft vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (3.9/5) overall. Spyrosoft is the better choice for embedded and automotive teams at Polish rates. MobiDev is the stronger option for IoT apps with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Spyrosoft vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland | Norcross, Georgia, United States |
| Team size | 1,500+ | 250–450 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, Qt | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics |
Spyrosoft vs MobiDev: overview
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Wrocław, with a UK arm in Dorset. Estimates of its headcount range from about 800 to 1,900. Embedded software, automotive and industrial systems make up a large share of its work, next to general cloud and web development. It is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Services and capabilities: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Capability | Spyrosoft | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Spyrosoft | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Spyrosoft | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Spyrosoft | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | An automotive supplier needs an HMI team., An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Spyrosoft vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly |
| + | Public company, so finances are visible |
| + | Polish location suits EU buyers |
| - | Rapid growth means varying maturity between units |
| - | Little in-house electronics design |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs an HMI team.
Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Spyrosoft |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Spyrosoft (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Spyrosoft |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Neither; consider a hardware design house |
Use case fit: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
| Use case | Spyrosoft fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An automotive supplier needs an HMI team. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. | Strong | Limited | Spyrosoft |
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Spyrosoft vs MobiDev
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group.
MobiDev (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a factory needs computer vision quality checks. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Spyrosoft vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Spyrosoft better than MobiDev?
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT.
How do Spyrosoft and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Spyrosoft or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Spyrosoft and MobiDev?
Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. They also differ in team size (1,500+ vs 250–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Automotive, Industrial equipment vs Retail, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.