Sirin Software vs Very: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Very (4.2/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. Very is the stronger option for funded US product teams, platform-heavy IoT. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Very: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| HQ | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) | Bozeman, Montana, United States (distributed) |
| Team size | 50–200 | 150–250 |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE | Embedded C, Elixir, Nerves |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture |
Sirin Software vs Very: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Very
Very was founded in 2011 by Ben Wald and started out building software and websites before settling on IoT. Its staff work remotely across the US, with Bozeman, Montana listed as its base, and Built In counts 193 employees. The company covers hardware prototyping, firmware, IoT platforms and apps. Its Clutch profile lists a $250,000 minimum project size and $200 to $300 hourly rates.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Very
| Capability | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✓ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $250,000 |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Time and materials, Team extension |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Very
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Very |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home | Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics |
| Best use cases | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team., An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Time and materials |
Sirin Software vs Very: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
| Very | |
|---|---|
| + | US-based engineers and product managers |
| + | Strong on cloud platforms and data, not just devices |
| + | Experience taking products from prototype to launch |
| - | $250,000 minimum and $200 to $300 hourly rates rule out most small projects |
| - | Less electronics design depth than dedicated hardware houses |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Very?
A typical fit: a funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team.
US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. Minimum engagement starts at $250,000. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Consumer electronics, Agriculture.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Very
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs Very ($250,000) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Very |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Very |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Very
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Very fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A funded start-up needs a connected product and platform built by a US team. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| An energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Strong | Very |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Very
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team.
Very (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an energy company wants a fleet monitoring platform. If your situation matches that, Very is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Very FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Very?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development. Very's strongest advantage: US-based engineers and product managers.
How do Sirin Software and Very differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Very uses time and materials pricing with a minimum engagement of $250,000. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Very?
Very is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Very?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Very's primary differentiator is: US-only distributed team with strong product management and platform engineering. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 150–250), minimum engagement (Not published vs $250,000), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Healthcare vs Industrial equipment, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.