Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Spyrosoft (4.1/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. Spyrosoft is the stronger option for embedded and automotive teams at Polish rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 50–200 | 1,500+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, Qt |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy |
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Spyrosoft
Spyrosoft was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Wrocław, with a UK arm in Dorset. Estimates of its headcount range from about 800 to 1,900. Embedded software, automotive and industrial systems make up a large share of its work, next to general cloud and web development. It is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Capability | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Spyrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home | Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | An automotive supplier needs an HMI team., An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
| Spyrosoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly |
| + | Public company, so finances are visible |
| + | Polish location suits EU buyers |
| - | Rapid growth means varying maturity between units |
| - | Little in-house electronics design |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Spyrosoft?
A typical fit: an automotive supplier needs an HMI team.
Large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Industrial equipment, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs Spyrosoft (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Neither; consider a hardware design house |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Spyrosoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| An automotive supplier needs an HMI team. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| An industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. | Limited | Strong | Spyrosoft |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team.
Spyrosoft (4.1/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an industrial firm wants Qt interfaces for machines. If your situation matches that, Spyrosoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Spyrosoft FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Spyrosoft?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development. Spyrosoft's strongest advantage: can staff sizeable embedded teams quickly.
How do Sirin Software and Spyrosoft differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Spyrosoft uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Spyrosoft?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Spyrosoft?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Spyrosoft's primary differentiator is: large embedded and automotive teams inside a listed Polish group. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 1,500+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Healthcare vs Automotive, Industrial equipment).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.