Sirin Software vs Sigma Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Sirin Software (4.2/5) edges ahead of Sigma Software (4.0/5) overall. Sirin Software is the better choice for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. Sigma Software is the stronger option for embedded and cloud teams under Swedish ownership. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Sirin Software vs Sigma Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2002 |
| HQ | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) | Stockholm, Sweden and Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 50–200 | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team | Scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, dedicated team | Time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment | Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare, Energy |
Sirin Software vs Sigma Software: overview
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Sigma Software
Sigma Software was founded in 2002 and is part of the Swedish Sigma group. It describes a team of over 2,100 professionals in offices across 19 countries. Embedded and automotive software are among its practices, alongside a wide range of web, cloud and enterprise work. IoT buyers will find capable firmware and cloud engineers, but not a hardware design house.
Services and capabilities: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Capability | Sirin Software | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Framework / platform | Sirin Software | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Criterion | Sirin Software | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Dimension | Sirin Software | Sigma Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home | Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | A telecoms company needs embedded network software., An automotive supplier wants firmware developers. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Sirin Software vs Sigma Software: pros and cons
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
| Sigma Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Swedish parent adds governance |
| + | Broad coverage of firmware, cloud and apps |
| + | Competitive rates |
| - | IoT is not its main focus |
| - | No electronics design |
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Who should choose Sigma Software?
A typical fit: a telecoms company needs embedded network software.
Scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Automotive, Telecoms, Healthcare, Energy.
Decision matrix: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Sigma Software |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Sirin Software (Not published) vs Sigma Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Sirin Software |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Neither; consider a hardware design house |
Use case fit: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
| Use case | Sirin Software fit | Sigma Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Strong | Limited | Sirin Software |
| A telecoms company needs embedded network software. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| An automotive supplier wants firmware developers. | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Limited | Strong | Sigma Software |
Verdict: Sirin Software vs Sigma Software
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team.
Sigma Software (4.0/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: an automotive supplier wants firmware developers. If your situation matches that, Sigma Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Sirin Software vs Sigma Software FAQ
Is Sirin Software better than Sigma Software?
Sirin Software (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development. Sigma Software's strongest advantage: swedish parent adds governance.
How do Sirin Software and Sigma Software differ in pricing?
Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Sigma Software uses time and materials, dedicated team, fixed price pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Sirin Software or Sigma Software?
Sirin Software is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Sirin Software and Sigma Software?
Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Sigma Software's primary differentiator is: scandinavian governance with Ukrainian and Polish embedded engineers. They also differ in team size (50–200 vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer electronics, Healthcare vs Automotive, Telecoms).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.