Etteplan vs Sirin Software: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Etteplan (4.3/5) edges ahead of Sirin Software (4.2/5) overall. Etteplan is the better choice for industrial machinery makers, Nordic buyers. Sirin Software is the stronger option for firmware and IoT apps at Ukrainian rates. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Etteplan vs Sirin Software: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Etteplan | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2014 |
| HQ | Espoo, Finland | Florida, United States (R&D in Kyiv, Ukraine) |
| Team size | 3,500–4,000 | 50–200 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company | US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price, managed service | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, PCB design | Embedded C/C++, Embedded Linux, BLE |
| Industries served | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment |
Etteplan vs Sirin Software: overview
Etteplan
Etteplan is a Finnish engineering services company with around 3,800 to 4,000 staff in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Denmark and China. Its Software and Embedded Solutions unit develops embedded software, electronics and IoT systems for industrial manufacturers. In March 2026 the company finished change negotiations in that unit covering 336 people in Finland and cut up to 28 jobs. It also does mechanical engineering and technical documentation, which is useful when a product needs more than electronics.
Sirin Software
Sirin Software was founded in March 2014 and has its R&D centre in Kyiv, with the company registered in Florida. A 2016 merger with Lampa Studio added mobile and web development. Directories now put the team at 50 to 200 people. Embedded systems, IoT and server-side software are its core business.
Services and capabilities: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Capability | Etteplan | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✗ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✓ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Framework / platform | Etteplan | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | ✓ |
| Embedded Linux | ✓ | ✓ |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | ✓ |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | ✓ | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Criterion | Etteplan | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Managed service, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Dimension | Etteplan | Sirin Software |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare | Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home |
| Best use cases | A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line., An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app., A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Etteplan vs Sirin Software: pros and cons
| Etteplan | |
|---|---|
| + | Can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics |
| + | Public listing gives transparency on finances |
| + | Large Nordic industrial client base |
| - | Cut up to 28 jobs in its embedded unit in Finland in March 2026 |
| - | Heavier process and overhead than boutique IoT firms |
| Sirin Software | |
|---|---|
| + | Good balance of firmware and app development |
| + | US entity for contracting |
| + | Lower rates than Western European IoT firms |
| - | Delivery is concentrated in Kyiv, so continuity plans need checking |
| - | Limited circuit design capability |
Who should choose Etteplan?
A typical fit: a machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line.
Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Industrial equipment, Energy, Healthcare, Automotive.
Who should choose Sirin Software?
A typical fit: a smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app.
US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Consumer electronics, Healthcare, Smart home, Industrial equipment.
Decision matrix: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Etteplan |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Sirin Software |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Etteplan (Not published) vs Sirin Software (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Etteplan |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Etteplan |
Use case fit: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
| Use case | Etteplan fit | Sirin Software fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A machinery maker wants connectivity added to a product line. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| An energy company needs control electronics redesigned. | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| A smart home brand needs firmware and a companion app. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| A device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. | Limited | Strong | Sirin Software |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Etteplan |
Verdict: Etteplan vs Sirin Software
Etteplan (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company.
Sirin Software (4.2/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a device maker wants a Linux gateway connected to the cloud. If your situation matches that, Sirin Software is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Etteplan vs Sirin Software FAQ
Is Etteplan better than Sirin Software?
Etteplan (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Etteplan's strongest advantage: can handle mechanical design and documentation as well as electronics. Sirin Software's strongest advantage: good balance of firmware and app development.
How do Etteplan and Sirin Software differ in pricing?
Etteplan uses time and materials, fixed price, managed service pricing. Sirin Software uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Etteplan or Sirin Software?
Etteplan is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Etteplan and Sirin Software?
Etteplan's primary differentiator is: Mechanical, electrical and embedded engineering in one listed company. Sirin Software's primary differentiator is: US contracting with a Kyiv embedded team. They also differ in team size (3,500–4,000 vs 50–200), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Industrial equipment, Energy vs Consumer electronics, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.