Cogniteq vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Cogniteq (4.0/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (3.9/5) overall. Cogniteq is the better choice for IoT MVPs with an EU-based vendor. MobiDev is the stronger option for IoT apps with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2009 |
| HQ | Vilnius, Lithuania (offices in Poland) | Norcross, Georgia, United States |
| Team size | 50–250 | 250–450 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Embedded C, BLE, AWS IoT | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home, Retail | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics |
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: overview
Cogniteq
Cogniteq was founded in 2005 and lists its locations as Lithuania and Poland, with a head office in Vilnius. It has 50 to 250 people, depending on the directory, and reports more than 300 launched projects. Its IoT services include consulting, application development, MVPs and hardware engineering, next to web, mobile and enterprise work. Its Clutch profile shows a 4.9 rating from 44 reviews.
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Services and capabilities: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Capability | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✗ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✓ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✗ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | ✓ | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Cogniteq | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A start-up needs a connected health MVP., A logistics firm wants a BLE tracking app. | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Cogniteq vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Cogniteq | |
|---|---|
| + | Strong client reviews |
| + | EU locations for contracting |
| + | Handles MVPs well |
| - | Hardware engineering is less established than its software work |
| - | Office details differ between sources |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
Who should choose Cogniteq?
A typical fit: a start-up needs a connected health MVP.
Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Logistics, Smart home, Retail.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cogniteq |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cogniteq (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cogniteq |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Cogniteq |
Use case fit: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
| Use case | Cogniteq fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A start-up needs a connected health MVP. | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
| A logistics firm wants a BLE tracking app. | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Cogniteq |
Verdict: Cogniteq vs MobiDev
Cogniteq (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering.
MobiDev (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a factory needs computer vision quality checks. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cogniteq vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Cogniteq better than MobiDev?
Cogniteq (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cogniteq's strongest advantage: strong client reviews. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT.
How do Cogniteq and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Cogniteq uses time and materials, fixed price pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cogniteq or MobiDev?
MobiDev is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cogniteq and MobiDev?
Cogniteq's primary differentiator is: mid-sized EU vendor that covers IoT apps and some hardware engineering. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. They also differ in team size (50–250 vs 250–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Logistics vs Retail, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.