Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) edges ahead of MobiDev (3.9/5) overall. Cambridge Consultants is the better choice for novel sensing and wireless, first-of-a-kind devices. MobiDev is the stronger option for IoT apps with AI or AR features. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cambridge Consultants | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1960 | 2009 |
| HQ | Cambridge, United Kingdom (part of Capgemini) | Norcross, Georgia, United States |
| Team size | 800–900 | 250–450 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules | Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills |
| Pricing model | Time and materials, fixed price for defined phases | Time and materials, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | RF design, Embedded C/C++, DSP | Python, Computer vision, AWS IoT |
| Industries served | Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics, Industrial equipment, Agriculture | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics |
Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev: overview
Cambridge Consultants
Cambridge Consultants has been developing products for clients since 1960 and employs more than 800 engineers, scientists and designers in Cambridge, Boston, Tokyo and Singapore. It came into Capgemini when Capgemini bought its parent Altran in 2020, and joined Capgemini Invent in 2021. Work spans medical devices, wireless systems, sensing and other early-stage technology. It also licenses intellectual property it creates.
MobiDev
MobiDev was founded in 2009, opened a US office in Atlanta in 2011, and now lists its headquarters in the Atlanta area. Its engineering centres are in Chernivtsi, Ukraine, and Łódź, Poland. The team was 436 people in late 2022, and recent estimates are closer to 290. IoT is one of several practices next to web, mobile, AI and augmented reality.
Services and capabilities: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Capability | Cambridge Consultants | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Electronics & PCB design | ✓ | ✗ |
| Firmware & embedded software | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wireless connectivity | ✓ | ✗ |
| IoT cloud platforms | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile & web apps | ✗ | ✓ |
| Edge AI & data | ✓ | ✓ |
| Prototyping & manufacturing support | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Framework / platform | Cambridge Consultants | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Embedded C | ✓ | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| RTOS | N/A | N/A |
| BLE | N/A | N/A |
| LoRaWAN | N/A | N/A |
| AWS IoT | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure IoT | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Criterion | Cambridge Consultants | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Time and materials | Dedicated team, Time and materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Dimension | Cambridge Consultants | MobiDev |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics | Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment |
| Best use cases | A medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device., A telecoms company wants a custom radio designed. | A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring., A factory needs computer vision quality checks. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Dedicated team |
Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev: pros and cons
| Cambridge Consultants | |
|---|---|
| + | Can solve physics and RF problems that most IoT vendors would avoid |
| + | Long medical device record with quality systems to match |
| + | Capgemini's global network for scale-up after development |
| - | Owned by Capgemini since 2020 through the Altran deal |
| - | Premium pricing that rarely suits ordinary connected products |
| - | Less focus on long-term cloud operations |
| MobiDev | |
|---|---|
| + | AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT |
| + | US contracting entity |
| + | Cost-effective Ukrainian and Polish teams |
| - | Headcount appears to have fallen since 2022 |
| - | Little firmware or hardware depth |
Who should choose Cambridge Consultants?
A typical fit: a medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device.
Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms, Consumer electronics, Industrial equipment, Agriculture.
Who should choose MobiDev?
A typical fit: a retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring.
Combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Healthcare, Industrial equipment, Logistics.
Decision matrix: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cambridge Consultants |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | MobiDev |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cambridge Consultants (Not published) vs MobiDev (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cambridge Consultants |
| You want engineers added to your own in-house team | Neither lists team extension; ask about dedicated teams |
| You need the circuit board designed as well as the firmware | Cambridge Consultants |
Use case fit: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
| Use case | Cambridge Consultants fit | MobiDev fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A medtech firm needs a new sensing method developed for a diagnostic device. | Strong | Limited | Cambridge Consultants |
| A telecoms company wants a custom radio designed. | Strong | Limited | Cambridge Consultants |
| A retailer wants camera-based shelf monitoring. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| A factory needs computer vision quality checks. | Limited | Strong | MobiDev |
| You need custom electronics designed, not only firmware | Strong | Limited | Cambridge Consultants |
| You want a fixed-price first phase before a longer engagement | Strong | Limited | Cambridge Consultants |
Verdict: Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev
Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IoT Development projects. Scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules.
MobiDev (3.9/5) is worth a look in a scenario like this: a factory needs computer vision quality checks. If your situation matches that, MobiDev is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cambridge Consultants vs MobiDev FAQ
Is Cambridge Consultants better than MobiDev?
Cambridge Consultants (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cambridge Consultants's strongest advantage: can solve physics and RF problems that most IoT vendors would avoid. MobiDev's strongest advantage: AI and computer vision experience for camera-based IoT.
How do Cambridge Consultants and MobiDev differ in pricing?
Cambridge Consultants uses time and materials, fixed price for defined phases pricing. MobiDev uses time and materials, dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cambridge Consultants or MobiDev?
Cambridge Consultants is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cambridge Consultants and MobiDev?
Cambridge Consultants's primary differentiator is: scientists and engineers able to invent the technology a product needs, not just integrate existing modules. MobiDev's primary differentiator is: combines IoT software with computer vision and AR skills. They also differ in team size (800–900 vs 250–450), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare and medical devices, Telecoms vs Retail, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.